Google picture of existing strip peat mine on shores of Lake Winnipeg

I was very confused and frustrated to learn that there were several new applications for peat mine operations to begin very close to the shores of Lake Winnipeg in the Grindstone/Hecla area. It turns out that the Save Lake Winnipeg Act only stops new lease applications, not current lease holders from activating their leases. A number of individuals and organizations have recently begun to draw attention to this problem and try to stop new operations from being allowed.

There are two significant problems with peat mining from an environmental perspective. The first, in relation to blue-green algae blooms in Lake Winnipeg, is that the peat land is a type of wetland and performs a similar function to other types of wetlands in filtering water before it hits the lake. The peat land will slow the water down and soak up some of the phosphorus and nitrogen that contribute to the blue-green algae blooms. The mining of the peat involves basically cutting down everything in the mine site and then stripping off the peat layer. This will increase sediment run-off from this area as well as removing any filtering capacity of the land.Check out the picture above to see that it looks just like clearcutting when viewed from above.

The second very big problem is that stripping the peat will release large amounts of carbon to the atmosphere which is the opposite of what we’d like to see occurring at a time when global warming and its negative consequences,  are  becoming so evident. I hope that the government will end up doing the right thing and fulfilling the spirit of the Save Lake Winnipeg Act. If anyone is interested in submitting your comments to the public process about the current peat application # 5548.00 Hay Point Peat Mine you can do so at the Environment Assessment Licensing Branch of Conservation.

Rain Garden with Native Plants

The St. Norbert Community Centre, St.Norbert Farmers’ Market, Place Saint-Norbert, Ecole Noel Ritchot and the Behavioural Health Foundation, as well as some concerned citizens have decided that they want to solve their water problems in an environmentally sustainable manner that won’t contribute further to Lake Winnipeg’s problems so they commissioned the design of the Drainage Inside the Dike project. In a nutshell, it’s a resculpting of land with berms, swales and rain gardens that will hold onto water and allow it to slowly seep into the ground instead of running off fast into the stormwater sewer system. Native plantings, such as big bluestem, black-eyed susans and buffalo grass, with their long roots, will soak up some of the phosphorus and nitrogen that we don’t want getting into our freshwater.

Janice Lukes, Coordinator of the St. Norbert Watershed Coalition, says groups need to think beyond their own property lines as water doesn’t respect those boundaries. All the groups involved are going to improve their own sites at the same time as decreasing their contribution to Lake Winnipeg’s problems. I’m excited to learn about this project because its such a good example of what we could be doing all over our landscapes to slow down water flows, decrease flood concerns and improve water quality.

Blue-green algae on shores of Lake Winnipeg

 In today’s Winnipeg Free Press there is an article which clearly articulates how poorly Winnipeg rates in comparison to other cities and industrial facilities across the country in terms of phosphorus being discharged into our waterways. We have the distinction of being the fourth worst phosphorus dumper in the country. Along with that distinction, our province is also home to what is considered the “sickest lake” in the world, Lake Winnipeg. This is not a coincidence. These two are connected.

From my perspective, as an advocate for the health of the lake, it is extremely frustrating that the city of Winnipeg has not demonstrated any leadership in terms of making the necessary investments in upgrading our wastewater treatment facilities. How can we expect others who are much further from the lake to do the right thing when we are not willing to lead the way.  The problems we see in Lake Winnipeg are going to get worse and those of us who live in Winnipeg bear some responsibility for not insisting that our city do the right thing as soon as possible. Everyone who lives in the Lake Winnipeg watershed (almost 1 million square kilometers) has a part to play in cleaning up our lakes but we, the citizens of Winnipeg, have the greatest part to play. Let’s get going to do our part so we can push others to do theirs.

Lake Winnipeg Watershed - courtesy of Partners for the Saskatchewan River Basin

This concept seems so appropriate to be applied to water data because when you think about water, you have to realize that it is crossing so many man-made political boundaries. Each jurisdiction has their own particular way of collecting and recording data but the information gleaned from this data has relevance across all of these boundaries. As we know in Manitoba, the problems that are besieging Lake Winnipeg, are the cumulative result of water that has flowed throughout the watershed from The Rocky Mountains across Alberta, Saskatchewan and into Manitoba. From the south the water is flowing in the Red River starting in South Dakota and moving through North Dakota into Manitoba. From the east, the water starts almost at Lake Superior and moves through Ontario and Minnesota into Manitoba. That makes a lot of political boundaries for Lake Winnipeg’s water to cross.
It seems to me that it makes tremendous sense to use a system that will allow all those people working on and researching water issues, to have the easiest access to all the data available. I think the challenge will be to encourage everyone to use this web platform by sharing their own data and making use of data uploaded by others. It may require a letting go of “turf” and a genuine recognition of the value and synergies of collaborative efforts.

Blue-green algae at Minaki, Sept. 2011 photo courtesy of Todd Sellers

The Lake of the Woods Water Sustainability Foundation (LWWSF) recently published a Phosphorus Budget Study which details some interesting facts about water quality issues in Lake of the Woods and our warm fall is consistent with one of the most interesting facts they’ve presented.  According to their data, the Lake of the Woods now sees on average, one month longer ice free days throughout the year. In general the ice is freezing up 2 weeks later than it used to 40 years ago and thaws 2 weeks earlier. Todd Sellers, the Executive Director of the LWWSF, says this is great news for people who want to enjoy being on the water at the lake but the downside is that it offers a longer growing season for the algae. As Todd puts it, climate change is a real factor in the growing concerns about blue-green algae.
Robert T. Kristjanson, a fisher from Gimli Manitoba, was one of the other people who described some very big concerns with blue-green algae on Lake Winnipeg this fall. He and other members of the fishing industry encountered very thick algae near Grindstone on Lake Winnipeg.  Robert described it as “the worst he’s ever seen – it was like a wall clogging their nets so that the fish wouldn’t go near them.”It’s frustrating for Robert that the only time the algae makes news is when it washes up on busy beaches. He and other fishers often encounter it out in the middle of the lake where not many people will see it.
As I mentioned in a previous blog this summer, blue-green algae is becoming more of a problem in many areas around the world. We know that decreasing the excess nutrients of phosphorus and nitrogen getting into our waters is the solution and we also know how to accomplish this. What’s missing are the financial resources and the political will to make it happen.

Recent satellite image of Lake Winnipeg showing huge blue-green algae bloom, courtesy of the LWRC

In Manitoba we’re in the midst of a very public dispute between hog producers and some other types of farmers and the government over the issue of who is to blame for the excess nutrients getting into Lake Winnipeg and other water bodies. Once again Lake Winnipeg, the 10th largest freshwater lake in the world, has a very large blue-green algae bloom covering much of the north basin of the lake. It’s too bad that finger pointing about blame is taking all the attention here, instead of everyone, rural or urban, doing their part to fix this problem.

Satellite image of Lake Winnipeg with blue-green algae bloom in north,photo from the Lake Winnipeg Research Consortium

Today I was doing some research about how common blue-green algae is this summer. Instead of just “Googling” Canada as I often do, I left it wide-open putting blue-green algae 2011 in the search box. I was fascinated and dismayed to see reports of it, literally, around the world. From the State of Victoria in Australia to the UK and on up to the Baltic Sea in northern Europe and throughout North America, almost from coast to coast it is really blooming.
There are several American states including Oregon, Indiana, Oklahoma, Vermont, Kansas and Florida that have issued warnings to the public about staying out of waters that have signs of blue-green algae. In Kansas, there have been 3 dog deaths recently, one of which is confirmed as a result of toxic blue-green algae and the other 2 are suspected. There have also been 17 cases of human illness this year in Kansas that are suspected to be related to exposure to blue-green algae although it is not yet conclusive.
In Canada, there have been warnings about blue-green algae blooms in almost every province this summer. In my province of Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg, which often has massive blooms does have a large bloom in the north basin of the lake as evidenced by this satellite image but not much in the south basin which is where most cottagers locate. However there have been Algae Advisories in place on several smaller lakes in Manitoba including Falcon Lake, Pelican Lake, Killarney Lake and Rock Lake.
So this has made me realize that the challenges we face in the Lake Winnipeg watershed are shared by hundreds of other jurisdictions. Too much phosphorus and nitrogen getting into our waterways is causing problems all over the world. With this many countries suffering the negative environmental and human health effects of an overload of blue-green algae, I hope our collective efforts will push forward the changes that we all need to make.

Deerwood Dam South Tobacco Creek

Today we received the latest estimates of this year’s flood costs – $632 million for fighting the flood and compensating those who had suffered damages related to it. Imagine what the total costs would be if you added in Saskatchewan and North Dakota’s bills. Manitobans are hoping to recover $478 million of those costs from the federal government but any way you look at it, these costs are covered by our taxes and each one of us who pays taxes should be paying attention to this.
Given what scientists are telling us about changing climate patterns, we can expect to see floods of this nature much more frequently in the future as the severity of storms increases the amount of precipitation that is dropped at any one time. To some this might seem like a hopeless scenario but there is something we can do about it. We can immediately begin work on a variety of measures that will hold water on the land longer whether it be wetland restoration or preservation ; waffling systems such as are being developed in the Red River Basin; a series of small dams similar to what’s being going on in the Tobacco Creek watershed. There are a number of ways to increase water retention on the land and given the extreme dryness we’ve experienced this summer immediately following the flood, there are several good reasons to do this.
The big challenge will be to persuade governments to invest in this type of flood mitigation. At a time when we’re trying to decrease deficits and bring back balanced budgets how can we spend more to compensate landowners for some of these water retention methods that will need to occur on private land? My thought is that we can’t afford not to make these investments now. Otherwise our flood costs in future years may really bankrupt us!

Ross Bailey and neighbours' beach near Gimli

I attended the last of three public meetings at Victoria Beach on Monday night and was so impressed with the calibre of presentations from the twenty-one members of the public. The presentations were part of a public consultation on the issue of shoreline erosion and what should be done about it. An advisory committee has been set up to produce a report to the RM Council at Victoria Beach and to allow public participation in this heated issue.
The tone of the meeting was vastly different from the first meeting I attended on this issue last January. There was much more respect and a clear desire for a mutually beneficial solution. There were several themes that ran through many of the presentations, the first of which was recognition of the spiritual, aesthetic and historic connection that many people have to the beaches at Victoria Beach. So many people have been part of the Victoria Beach community for several generations and the beaches there are a significant part of those experiences. The second theme that seemed to resonate throughout was a feeling that the Hydro regulation of the lake was keeping it at heights that exacerbated the erosion. I don’t have enough knowledge of that issue to comment in an intelligent manner but with the upcoming Clean Environment Commission hearings on regulation of the lake, I hope we are able to acquire more unbiased information.

Ross Bailey's neighbour who didn't use shoreline technique, erosion from weather bomb in Oct. 2010

Two weeks ago, I spent an afternoon touring Lake Winnipeg shores on the west side of the lake around Gimli. Ross Bailey, a member of the Shoreline Erosion Technical Advisory Committee, wanted to show me the unique approach he had taken to shoreline issues at his own home twenty-five years ago. His approach has resulted in he and his neighbours, who’ve followed suit, having a beautiful beach and no erosion issues. However it requires a real shift in attitudes away from saving every foot of land towards understanding the natural lake processes and working with them. It may not be applicable to every situation but I think it merits consideration.
In the end, I am much more aware now of the natural rate of erosion for Lake Winnipeg shores and the inevitability of nature’s powers. It seems that we should keep this in mind to ensure that any future building is well back from the shores.